English technical abstract
This article develops the idea that the scan body represents the otherwise invisible implant within the digital workflow. An intraoral or laboratory scanner does not read the implant’s internal connection. It reads the external scan-body geometry, which CAD software then compares with the library file.
Scan-body quality therefore cannot be assessed by material or screw compatibility alone. The geometry must also provide sufficient height, surfaces, axial definition and orientation features for reliable recognition and stable library alignment*.
What the article covers and how to read it
Relevance for the laboratory, dental practice and technical support
- With multiple implants across an arch, verify that the upper orientation surfaces of each scan body are fully visible.
- If the software is uncertain when matching the library, the product itself may not be the problem. Possible causes include an incomplete mesh, reflections, saliva, an unfavourable angle or insufficiently readable geometry.
- This page serves as a bridge between the scan-body product page and articles on full-arch* scanning.
Limitations and cautious interpretation
Original source article
Original title: The Influence of Shape and Size of ScanBodies: An In Vitro Study on Accuracy and Precision
Download the original PDF
The source document remains available so readers can verify the original wording, methodology and results.
Related IPD pages and workflows
Glossary of abbreviations and specialist terms
An asterisk next to a term in the text refers to its explanation below.
- full-arch
- Full-arch means the entire dental arch, typically a scan or reconstruction of a complete edentulous arch.
- precision
- Precision describes repeatability, the ability to obtain similar results when a measurement is repeated.
- alignment
- Alignment is the registration or matching of a scanned 3D model to reference library geometry in CAD software.
- mesh
- A mesh is a 3D network of points and surfaces generated during digital scanning.

