Exclusive IPD distributor for the Czech and Slovak RepublicsOriginal components · CAD/CAM libraries · technical support+420 604 483 343obchod@exklusiv-dent.cz
Inside ScanLogiQ · live in Žďár
Three verification protocols

Intraoral implant scanning: CSS, ReScan and DeBug protocols

Three workflows address three different problems: how to scan consistently, how to correct a difficult part of the record, and how to verify data outside the original digital chain.

Clinical workflow and digital accuracyNew Italian editionEnglish technical adaptation
Source authors: Nicola Palladino; professional introduction by Francesco ManganoPublication: DentalTech / Infodent, 8–9/2023
Intraoral implant scanning: CSS, ReScan and DeBug protocols
Intraoral implant scanning: CSS, ReScan and DeBug protocols.

English technical abstract

The article starts from a practical problem: intraoral scanning of multiple implants remains highly dependent on the operator and arch geometry. Distal regions, the edentulous mandible and long surfaces without distinct landmarks can interrupt the scan and lead to incorrect mesh stitching.

ScanTransfer enables rigid connection of implant references and then supports three protocols. CSS Strategy simplifies the scan path; DeBug creates an independent physical master and returns analogue certainty to the digital workflow; ReScan allows difficult implant positions to be acquired extraorally and linked to the easier intraoral part of the record.

intraoral implant scanningCSS StrategyReScanDeBugScanTransfer
Editorial note: This page is an English technical adaptation and practical interpretation of the original Italian source, not a literal translation. The original PDF is attached below for verification of the methodology, wording and image documentation.

What the article shows

CSS StrategyIt brings reference planes closer together, creates a continuous “path” for the scanner and reduces fragmentation of the acquisition.
DeBugThe rigid assembly is removed from the mouth, analogs are added and a physical verification key is created for both CAD and the manufactured restoration.
ReScanThe easy, readily accessible area is captured intraorally; the problematic part is repeated outside the mouth.
One geometry, multiple checksThe same rigid assembly is used for scanning, position transfer, the laboratory record and the validation master.

The three protocols are not variants of the same procedure. Each addresses a different phase.

01

CSS Strategy

Problem: the scanner loses orientation and creates multiple fragments.

Intervention: a rigid, easily readable structure connects the scan bodies and shortens the complex intraoral path.

Output: a more continuous mesh with fewer critical stitching seams.

02

ReScan

Problem: a distal segment or limited mouth opening prevents stable acquisition.

Intervention: the reliable intraoral fragment is retained and the rigid assembly is rescanned accurately extraorally.

Output: implant positions from a more comfortable acquisition while preserving their correct relationship to tissues and occlusion.

03

DeBug

Problem: the same digital workflow cannot reliably identify its own systematic error.

Intervention: creation of a stone or other physical validation reference with analogs.

Output: an independent check of the design, milled restoration/framework and bonded Ti-bases.

What this means for the laboratory and clinic

  • Before scanning, determine whether the main risk is arch length, distal access, insufficient landmarks or the inability to perform independent verification.
  • Create the rigid connection without micromovement or deformation during polymerisation or handling.
  • With ReScan, preserve reliable overlapping areas for accurate registration of the intraoral and extraoral meshes.
  • Do not view the physical validation key as a step backwards, but as an independent measurement channel.
How this connects with IPD content

The content complements the ScanTransfer and ScanLogiQ product pages by explaining specifically when to use each protocol. Internal links guide users from the problem to the component, library and validation step, strengthening both UX and the site's topical authority.

Limitations and cautious interpretation

The described workflows are based on a specific system and clinical-laboratory experience. The accuracy of registering intraoral and extraoral data must be verified in the software used; rigidity of the assembly and correct library matching remain critical prerequisites.

Original source article

Original title: La scansione intraorale su impianti: nuovi protocolli di lavoro

Authors and source: Nicola Palladino; professional introduction by Francesco Mangano; DentalTech / Infodent, 8–9/2023.

Download the original PDF

The original Italian document contains the complete text, image documentation and any bibliography included by the authors.

PDF

Related IPD pages and workflows

Glossary of technical terms

CSS
Continuous Scan Strategy, a continuous scanning-path strategy.
extraoral scan
Acquisition of an object outside the mouth, often under more accessible and stable conditions.
rigid splinting
Rigid connection of multiple reference elements without relative micromovement.
alignment
Computational registration of two 3D data sets using shared geometry.
e-dent logo

I am a professional within the meaning of Section 2a of Czech Act No. 40/1995 Coll., on the Regulation of Advertising. I confirm that I am authorised to access pages intended for professionals.